User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 (x86_64)) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/36.0.1985.125 Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 36.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 36.0Blink Ubuntu desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 36.0.1985closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 36.0.1985.125Blink 537.36Ubuntu desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:30 | by ThaDafinser