User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 10.0; Android 4.2.1; Nokia; Lumia 520) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.135 Mobile Safari/537.36 Edge/12.10130

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Edge Mobile 12.0Edge 12.0WinPhone10 10.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 12.10130closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Microsoft Edge 12.10130Edge Windows Phone 10.0NokiaLumia 520smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 12.1013closeWindows Phone 10closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge Mobile 12.10130closeWindows Phone 10.0NokiaLumia 520closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Edge 12 EdgeHTML 12Windows Phone 10.0mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 12.10130closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2NokiaLumia 520Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:31 | by ThaDafinser