User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Jolicloud Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Joli OS/1.2 Chromium/23.0.1240.0 Chrome/23.0.1240.0 Safari/537.6

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 23.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 23.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 23.0.1240closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 23.0.1240.0Webkit 537.6Joli OS 1.2desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeJolicloud Linux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:32 | by ThaDafinser