User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 10.0; Android 4.2.1; WebView/3.0; SAMSUNG; GT-I8750) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2486.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 Edge/13.10586

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Edge Mobile 13.0Edge 13.0WinPhone10 10.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 13.10586closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Microsoft Edge 13.10586Edge Windows Phone 10.0SamsungGT-I8750smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 13.10586closeWindows Phone 10closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge Mobile 13.10586closeWindows Phone 10.0SamsungGT-I8750closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Edge 13 EdgeHTML 13Windows Phone 10.0SamsungAtiv Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 13.10586closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 46closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:32 | by ThaDafinser