User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux sh4) AppleWebKit/537.6+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/17.0.963.56 Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/537.6+HbbTV/1.1.1 (;iWedia;Teatro;3.0;;)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 17.0WebKit GNU/Linux TelefunkenMB95tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux iWediaTeatrocloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 537.6 iWediaTeatrotelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:33 | by ThaDafinser