User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; GT-P5200 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.132 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 10.1 3GTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 10.1"tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-P5200closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 33Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (10.1)tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2SamsungGT-P5200Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:34 | by ThaDafinser