User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us; Silk/1.0.22.153_10033210) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16 Silk-Accelerated=true

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 1.0WebKit Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 1.0.22.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 1.0Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 1.0.22closeAndroid AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 1.0Webkit 533.16FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.1closeMac OS X 10.6.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:34 | by ThaDafinser