User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.93 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 27.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 27.0WebKit Mac 10.7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 27Blink 537.36OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:35 | by ThaDafinser