User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 UBrowser/2.0.1144.0 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 2.0Blink 537.36Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:36 | by ThaDafinser