User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.0.2; xx; MI NOTE Pro Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 SogouMSE,SogouMobileBrowser/3.8.0

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 5.0XiaomiMI Note Prophabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 5.0.2closeAndroid 5.0.2XiaoMiMI NOTE Procloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Sogou Mobile 3.8Webkit 534.30Android 5.0.2XiaomiMi Note Promobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 5.0closeAndroid 5.0XiaomiMi Note ProSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:37 | by ThaDafinser