User agent detail

LG/KU990i/v10a Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.6 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA LGKU990Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG KU990icloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Obigo LGKU990ismartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGKU990icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Obigo Q 5A LGKU990 Viewtymobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGKU990iFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:40 | by ThaDafinser