User agent detail

HD_mini_T5555 Opera/9.7 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 9.7Presto 2.2 HTCHD mini T5555Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.7Presto Windows XPdesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HTCHD minimobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCHD Mini T5555Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:40 | by ThaDafinser