User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; HTC_Touch_Diamond2_T5353; Windows Phone 6.5)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Phone 6.5HTCTouch Diamond2 T5353smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPcloseWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:41 | by ThaDafinser