User agent detail

TCL-Z206_TD/1.0 Nucleus/1.3 JRDSZ36_10A/V01.01 Release/01.01.2011 Browser/Opera Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; Nucleus; Opera Mobi/4000; U; zh-CN) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus 1.3TCLZ206smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.10close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE TCLZ206mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
MAUI Browser close OperaMini 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:41 | by ThaDafinser