User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.0; zh-cn; TCL_P620M Build/LRX21M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit Android 5.0TCLP620Msmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.0closeAndroid 5.0TCLP620Mcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 6.0Webkit 537.36Android 5.0TCLP620mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:43 | by ThaDafinser