User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 LG-GM750Q Browser/IE8.12 MMS/LGMMSv1.0/1.2 Java/LGVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesGeneral CrawlersCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE LGGM750Qsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE LGGM750Qcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5LGLayla GM750mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile LGGM750HFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:43 | by ThaDafinser