User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.10 Chromium/15.0.874.121 Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 15.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 15.0WebKit Ubuntu 11.10desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 15.0.874closeUbuntu 11.10closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 15.0.874.121Webkit 535.2Ubuntu 11.10desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 15.0.874.121closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:43 | by ThaDafinser