User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; Nokia203/20.37) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.218 U2/1.0.0 Mobile

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.7U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.7 Symbian Nokia203smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 20.37)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close Nokia203closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 203mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 8close NokiaAsha 203Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:43 | by ThaDafinser