User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 Fennec/7.0.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Fennec 7.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Fennec 7.0Gecko Maemo yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 7.0.1closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Firefox Mobile Fennec 7.0.1Gecko 7.0.1Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 7.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 7.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:43 | by ThaDafinser