User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.101 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 45.0Blink Fedora desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeFedora closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 45Blink 537.36Fedora desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeFedora Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:44 | by ThaDafinser