User agent detail

Opera/9.5 (Microsoft Windows; PPC; Opera Mobi/1938; U; xx)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.5Presto Windows desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.5 Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close HTCP3702Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:45 | by ThaDafinser