User agent detail

MQQBrowser/40 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4S; CPU iPhone OS 6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B142 Safari/7534.48.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 40WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 40closeiOS 6.1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 4.0Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:45 | by ThaDafinser