User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; en-us ; CAT NOVA Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.3.0.143/145/352

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3CatSoundNovaTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android 2.3CatNOVAtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0closeAndroid 2.3.3CatNOVAcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.3Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3CATNOVAtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:45 | by ThaDafinser