User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; COS 1.0; COS like Android 4.1.2; zh_CN; HTC 802t Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) COSBrowser/2.2.4 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/537.17

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1HTC802tsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2HTC802tcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 537.17COS 1.0HTCOnemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:50 | by ThaDafinser