User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.0; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0; SAMSUNG; GT-I8350)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0SamsungGT-I8350smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0SamsungGT-I8350closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0SamsungOmnia Wmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeWindows Phone 7.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:50 | by ThaDafinser