User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; 40PX200; 0.7.3.0.; t12; ) ; Toshiba_TP/1.3.0 (+VIDEO_MP4+AUDIO_MPEG+AUDIO_MP4+VIDEO_X_MS_ASF+OFFLINEAPP) ; en) AppleWebKit/534.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
GNU/Linux Toshiba40PX200tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TOSHIBA40PX200closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 534.1 ToshibaRegza PX200 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:51 | by ThaDafinser