User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 9_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) FxiOS/1.0.1 Mobile/13C5055d Safari/601.1.46

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Firefox for iOS 1.0WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 601.1.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Firefox iOS 1.0WebKit iOS 9.2AppleiPadtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 9.2closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox iOS 1.0.0closeiOS 9.2AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Firefox 1.0.1Webkit 601.1.46iOS 9.2AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 9.2closeiOS 9.2AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:51 | by ThaDafinser