User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.1; zh-cn; MZ-M578C Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/40.0.2214.114 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 5.1MeizuM2smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.1MZ-M578Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 40Blink 537.36Android 5.1MZ-M578Cmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 40closeAndroid 5.1MeizuMZ-M578CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:51 | by ThaDafinser