User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; MZ601 Build/I.7.1-42) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.67495

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaXoomTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.0MotorolaMZ601tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaMZ601closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 18.0Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4MotorolaXOOM 3Gtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18closeAndroid 4.0MotorolaMZ601Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:42:59 | by ThaDafinser