User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ LG Browser/5.00.00(+mouse+SCREEN+TUNER; LGE; 42LP860H-ZA; 03.03.02; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.TV-2012

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 534.26closeLinux LG42LP860H-ZAcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser 5.00Webkit 534.26 LGLP860H NetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:02 | by ThaDafinser