User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.107 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1325.0 OMI/4.1.4.56.ALSAN3.7 SonyCEBrowser/1.0 (BDPlayer; BDP10G_AX; BDP2015/M24.D.0104; XAE;)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 19.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1325.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 19.0Blink GNU/Linux SonyCEBrowsersmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1325.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 19.0.1325closeLinux SonyCEBrowsercloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 4.1Blink 537.36 SonyBDP10G Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1325.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:03 | by ThaDafinser