User agent detail

ICC-Crawler/2.0 (Mozilla-compatible; ; http://www.nict.go.jp/en/univ-com/plan/crawl.html)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 6 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesICC-CrawlerCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ICC-Crawler 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
yesICC-Crawlercrawler Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesICC-Crawlerclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
closeyesclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesmisc crawlerclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:03 | by ThaDafinser