User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; xx; SD4930UR Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.29 like Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 3.29Blink Android 4.2AmazonFire PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.29closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2AmazonFire Phonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.29closeAndroid 4.2.2AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 3.29Blink 537.36FireOS 3AmazonFire Phonemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.2AmazonFire PhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:06 | by ThaDafinser