User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 IceDragon/26.0.0.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IceDragon 26.0Gecko 26.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IceDragon 26.0Gecko Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 26.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 26.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Comodo IceDragon 26.0Gecko 26.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:10 | by ThaDafinser