User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; it-it; Vodafone Smart Tab 4G Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 SVN/090FYG1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4VodafoneSmart Tab 4 LTETabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.4VodafoneSmart Tab 4Gtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4VodafoneSmart Tab 4Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium WebView 33Blink 537.36Android 4.4.4VodafoneSmart Tab 4Gtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 33closeAndroid 4.4VodafoneSmart Tab 4GTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:11 | by ThaDafinser