User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; EK-GC100 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60140

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Cameracamerayes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungEK-GC100closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 15.0Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Cameracamerayescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15closeAndroid 4.1SamsungEK-GC100Other Mobileyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:11 | by ThaDafinser