User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; xx; GT-I8800) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile TizenBrowser/2.0

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TizenBrowser 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Tizen 2.0SamsungGT-I8800smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux SamsungGT-I8800closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser 2.0Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0Samsung"Melius"mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:12 | by ThaDafinser