User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.32 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1196.29 (Edition Next)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 16.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1196.29closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Next 16.0Blink Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1196closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Next 16.0Blink 537.36Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:13 | by ThaDafinser