User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; H60-L02) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 baidubrowser/5.3.4.0 (Baidu; P1 4.3.1) tieba/6.7.2 BMW

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Baidu Browser 5.3WebKit Android 4.4HuaweiHonor 6smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Baidu Browser 5.3.4.0Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 33closeAndroid 4.4HuaweiH60-L02Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:14 | by ThaDafinser