User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; KFJWA Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.42 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" 4Gtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.0.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" 4Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Amazon WebView Blink 537.36FireOS AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFJWATabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:15 | by ThaDafinser