User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LGL39C Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 27.0WebKit Android 4.1LGL39Csmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.1.2LGLGL39Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 27Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2LGOptimus Dynamic IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 27closeAndroid 4.1LGL39C/V100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:18 | by ThaDafinser