User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2; SAMSUNG SM-Z9005-ORANGE/DailyRedwood8974EUROPEN_20130917.001) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2 Mobile Safari/537.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Samsung WebView 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2SamsungSM-Z9005-ORANGEsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2closeLinux SamsungSM-Z9005-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.3Tizen 2.2SamsungSM-Z9005 prototypemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:19 | by ThaDafinser