User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.1+ LG Browser/6.00.00(+3D; LGE; Media/BP740; 5037; abc;); LG NetCast.Media-2013 /5037 (LG, Media/BP740, wired)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 537.1closeLinux LGBP740closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser 6.00Webkit 537.1 LGBP740 NetCast Media 2013televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:19 | by ThaDafinser