User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-i8000/1.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.8.0.95

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 7.8 Windows CE SamsungOmnia IIsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeWindows CE SamsungGT-i8000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile SamsungI8000 Omnia IImobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SamsungGT i8000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:20 | by ThaDafinser