User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; arm; en, Nuvi) AppleWebKit/523.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile Safari/419.3 Qt Qtopia Iris/1.1.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 3.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 3.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.1.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Iris 1.1.2Webkit 523.13Qtopia GarminNuvigpscloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0closeLinux Garmin-AsusNuvifone G60Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:23 | by ThaDafinser