User agent detail

MOT-MB511/Blur_Version.0.45.203.MB511.Brasil.en.BR Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; xx; MB511 Build/RUTLA_U3_00.45.203) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1MotorolaMB511smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0MotorolaMB511closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1MotorolaFLIPOUTmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1MotorolaMB511Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:23 | by ThaDafinser