User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2.1.3; SM-R750) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.76 efl-webengine/0.1.1.1 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 34.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 34.0Blink Tizen 2.2SamsungSM-R750smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Blink 537.36Tizen 2.2.1.3SamsungGear Swatchyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:43:23 | by ThaDafinser